Universal storage security implement for cannabis containers

ABSTRACT

A universal security implement for cannabis containers includes a security mechanism interface, a rim, and an immobilization implement. A user of the universal security implement for cannabis containers can fully secure a container by situating the universal security implement onto or into the container such that the immobilization implement fully precludes movement relative to the container. Moreover, the universal security implement&#39;s user may manipulate a security mechanism, such as a child-resistant cap, such that the security mechanism and the security mechanism interface interact to fully close and secure the contents within the container.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The instant disclosure relates to security mechanisms for cannabis containers.

BACKGROUND

Though current cannabis containers and assemblies recognize the need for secure containment, they currently fall short of solutions for multiple applications of secure containment across types, classes, and manufactures of both cannabis containers and security mechanisms. Moreover, these currently available cannabis containers and assemblies only utilize secure containment mechanisms and methods that are nontransferable across different types, classes, and manufactures of cannabis containers, thus disallowing the cannabis container's user the ability to leverage a single security mechanism for containment across multiple cannabis containers.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

One or more preferred exemplary embodiments will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawings, where like designations denote like elements, and wherein:

FIG. 1 is a top side perspective view of an exemplary embodiment of the universal security implement for cannabis containers of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a side profile view of the universal security implement for cannabis containers.

FIG. 3 is a top side profile view of the universal security implement for cannabis containers.

FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the universal security implement for cannabis containers.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The universal security implement for cannabis containers of the instant disclosure solves the aforementioned problems—first, an inability or unavailability to utilize multiple cannabis containers across a range of types, classes, or manufactures within a given size with a single corresponding security mechanism for secure containment; second, an inability or unavailability to utilize multiple types of security mechanisms for secure containment for a single cannabis container of a given type, class, size, or manufacture; and third, the inability or unavailability to transfer a security mechanism for secure containment from one cannabis container of a given type, class, size, or manufacture to another cannabis container within the same type, class, size, or manufacture—in at least two ways: first, by having a means by which the device can interface with multiple security mechanisms which correspond to cannabis containers within a given type, class, size, or manufacture; and second, by acting as the platform by which secure containment can be transferred via immobilization within cannabis containers belonging to a given type, class, size, or manufacture, thereby implementing a way by which to secure the contents within the cannabis container while simultaneously leveraging a preexisting means of secure containment.

Referring to the drawings, and in particular FIG. 1, an exemplary embodiment of a universal security implement for cannabis containers 10, designed to be used with at least one security mechanism such as, but not limited to, child-resistant security caps, is shown according to the instant disclosure. Referring to FIG. 2, a security mechanism 20 and a container 30 are shown with respect to the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10.

Referring to FIGS. 2 and 4, a security mechanism interface 200 is shown in profile. The security mechanism interface 200 has an extent measured perpendicularly relative to the rim 300. The security mechanism interface 200 has an inner surface 202 that is contiguous with the totality of the interior of the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10. The security mechanism interface 200 has an outer surface 204. The outer surface 204 of the security mechanism interface 200 has at least one thread 206. The at least one thread 206 has a volume 208. The at least one thread has an extent 210. The volume 208 and extent 210 of the at least one thread 206 work in concert such that they are sufficient to allow interaction with a corresponding security implement, for example, but not limited to, a child resistant cap; the type, class, size, or manufacture of which may vary depending upon the device user's preferences; such that the interaction between the security implement, the at least one thread's volume 208, and the at least one thread's extent 210 results in secure closure of the cannabis container onto or into which the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 is situated.

Again referring to the drawings, and in particular FIGS. 2, 3, and 4, a rim 300 of the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 is shown. Referring in particular to FIG. 3 the rim 300 of the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 has a volume 302. The rim's volume 302 is sufficient to provide the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 both transverse and counter pressure against the terminal edge of a cannabis container 30 onto or into which the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 is situated. This transverse and counter pressure permits the device's user to limit the extent of the user's insertion of an immobilization implement 400 to its maximum perpendicular extent measured relative to the planar axis of the rim 300 as depicted in FIGS. 2 and 4, while additionally acting as a means by which the device's user may physically manipulate the device upon sufficient force relative to the cannabis container 30. Additionally, the rim's volume 302 permits the secure containment mechanism's terminal edge, such as that of a child-resistant cap, to abut against the upper surface of the rim 300, if so required. Moreover, the rim's volume 302 also provides the device's user a means by which to remove the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 from the cannabis container 30, however situated relative to the cannabis container 30, and transfer the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 to another cannabis container 30, thus allowing the device's user to fully maximize the device's utility.

Referring particularly to FIGS. 2 and 4, the rim 300 of the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 has an extent 304. The rim's extent 304 is sufficient such that it can create a minimal barrier between the security mechanism 20 and the cannabis container 30 onto or into which the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 is situated. The rim's extent 304 creates this barrier by abutting the terminal edge of the cannabis container 30 to a sufficient degree such that the device's user can reach a maximum extent of insertion of the immobilization implement 400 into the cannabis container 30. Additionally, the rim's extent 304 complements the immobilization implement's 400 functionality by working in concert with the rim's volume 302 by providing transverse pressure such that the device's user can exercise leverage or pressure in order to properly utilize the security mechanism 30 without worry that the entire universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 will shift, rotate, or dislodge.

Referring to FIGS. 2 and 4, the immobilization implement 400 is depicted. The immobilization implement 400 has an inner surface 402 that is contiguous with the totality of the interior of the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10. The immobilization implement 400 has an outer surface 404. The outer surface 404 of the immobilization implement 400 has at least one rib 406. The at least one rib 406 has a volume 408. The at least one rib 406 has an extent 410. The volume 408 and the extent 410 of the at least one rib 406 work in concert such that they provide the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 sufficient interaction with the interior surface of the cannabis container 30 into or onto which it is situated, in which the resulting interaction provides the requisite level of physical friction, grip, or some other method or mode of immobilization, such that all movement of the device is precluded with respect to the cannabis container 30. This mechanism of immobilization can be one which facilitates a press-fit restriction on the inner wall of the container 30 such that the rotational, lateral, ascending, and descending movement of the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 is prevented upon insertion into the container 30.

In addition to the features described herein, the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 may take on multiple configurations. In an unsecured configuration, the immobilization implement 400 of the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 can be inserted into a cannabis container 30 up to a maximum perpendicular extent as measured from the terminal edge of the immobilization implement 400 with respect to the rim 300 of the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10. In this configuration, upon insertion and immobilization of the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10, the device in conjunction with a cannabis container 30 is said to be unsecured because the security mechanism interface 200 has yet to interface or accept a security mechanism 20 with which it will interact resulting in secure closure of the device. Thus, the device's user has complete access to the contents contained within the cannabis container 30, or alternatively, still has the ability to place contents into it.

Furthermore, the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 may take on a semi-secured configuration. In a semi-secured configuration, the immobilization implement 400 is inserted into the cannabis container 30 into or onto which the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 is situated. Additionally, in this configuration, the security mechanism interface 200 has accepted a corresponding security mechanism 20 but has not yet been totally secured by the relevant mechanism of secure containment created by the interaction of the security mechanism 20 and the at least one thread 206 on the outer surface 204 of the security mechanism interface 200 of the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10. Thus, though the contents of the cannabis container 30 may be covered by the security mechanism 20, they are not yet completely secure until the requisite interaction between the security mechanism 20 and the at least on thread 206 of the security mechanism interface 200 is successfully completed.

Moreover, the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 may take on a secured configuration. In the secured configuration, the universal security implement for cannabis containers 10 in conjunction with a cannabis container 30 and a corresponding security mechanism 20 contain all of the features and characteristics of a semi-secured configuration with the addition of further manipulation of the security mechanism 20 with respect to the at least one thread 206 of the security mechanism interface 200, such that the interaction between the security mechanism 20 and the at least one thread 206 of the security mechanism interface 200 results in secure closure of the cannabis container 30. Thus, in a secured configuration, the device's user will not be able to exert any amount of force, pressure, or leverage, exclusive of the amount to destroy the device's structural integrity, sufficient to overcome the resistance created between the interaction of the security mechanism 20 and the at least one thread 206 of the security mechanism interface 200.

It is to be understood that the foregoing is a description of one or more preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention. The invention is not limited to the particular embodiment(s) disclosed herein, but rather is defined solely by the claims below. Furthermore, the statements contained in the foregoing description relate to particular embodiments and are not to be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention or on the definition of terms used in the claims, except where a term or phrase is expressly defined above. Various other embodiments and various changes and modifications to the disclosed embodiment(s) will become apparent to those skilled in the art. All such other embodiments, changes, and modifications are intended to come within the scope of the appended claims.

As used in this specification and claims, the terms “for example,” “for instance,” “such as,” and “like,” and the verbs “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and their other verb forms, when used in conjunction with a listing of one or more components or other items, are each to be construed as open-ended, meaning that the listing is not to be considered as excluding other, additional components or items. Other terms are to be construed using their broadest reasonable meaning unless they are used in a context that requires a different interpretation. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A universal security implement, comprising: a security mechanism interface; the security mechanism interface having at least one thread, the at least one thread having a first volume, and the at least one thread having a first extent; a rim; and an immobilization implement; the immobilization implement having at least one rib, the at least one rib having a second volume, and the at least one rib having a second extent, the second extent and second volume being different that the first extent and first volume, respectively; wherein, in order to bring a container into a fully secured state, the immobilization implement of the universal security implement is situated onto or into the open end of a container, such that abutment between the at least one rib of the immobilization implement and the container precludes movement of the universal security implement relative to the container.
 2. A universal security implement, comprising: a security mechanism interface; the security mechanism interface having at least one thread, the at least one thread having a first volume, and the at least one thread having a first extent; a rim; and an immobilization implement; the immobilization implement having at least one rib, the at least one rib having a second volume, and the at least one rib having a second extent, the second extent and second volume being different that the first extent and first volume, respectively; wherein, in order to bring a container into a fully secured state, a mechanism of secure closure utilized by a security mechanism interacts with the at least one thread of the security implement interface, the interaction resulting in an inability to access the interior volume of the container onto or into which the universal security implement is situated.
 3. A universal security implement, comprising: a security mechanism interface; the security mechanism interface having at least one thread, the at least one thread having a first volume, and the at least one thread having a first extent; a rim; and an immobilization implement; the immobilization implement having at least one rib, the at least one rib having a second volume, and the at least one rib having a second extent, the second extent and second volume being different that the first extent and first volume, respectively: wherein, in order to transfer the universal security implement from a first container to a second container, a sufficient use of force or leverage is exerted on the universal security implement in order to overcome immobilization of the universal security implement within the first container, thereby permitting insertion of the universal security implement into the second container, such that the abutment between the at least one rib of the immobilization implement and the second container's inner wall precludes movement of the universal security implement relative to the second container, thus bringing the second container into a fully secured state; the universal security mechanism leveraging a first security mechanism or a second security mechanism while fully securing the second container, where the first security mechanism is different than the second security mechanism.
 4. The universal security implement of claim 2, wherein the at least one thread of the security mechanism interface has a thread angle such that a security mechanism can be urged over the at least one thread in a manner sufficient to bring the container to a fully secured state.
 5. The universal security implement of claim 2, wherein the at least one thread of the security mechanism interface has a thread angle sufficient to disallow disengagement of a security mechanism absent the requisite spatial manipulation and application of force or leverage of the security mechanism.
 6. The universal security implement of claim 2, wherein the at least one thread of the security mechanism interface has a volume sufficient to allow spatial manipulation of the security mechanism such that the manipulation results in a fully secured state of a container.
 7. The universal security implement of claim 2, wherein the at least one thread of the security mechanism interface has a volume sufficient to disallow disengagement of a security mechanism absent the requisite spatial manipulation and application of force or leverage of the security mechanism.
 8. The universal security implement of claim 2, wherein the at least one thread of the security mechanism interface has an extent sufficient to allow spatial manipulation of the security mechanism such that the manipulation results in a fully secured state of a container.
 9. The universal security implement of claim 2, wherein the at least one thread of the security mechanism interface has an extent sufficient to disallow disengagement of a security mechanism absent the requisite spatial manipulation and application of force or leverage of the security mechanism.
 10. The universal security implement of claim 1, wherein the universal security implement contains at least one manner of manipulation sufficient to allow manipulation of the spatial orientation of the universal security implement relative to a container.
 11. The universal security implement of claim 1, wherein the rim has a radially-outwardly directed expanse.
 12. The universal security implement of claim 1, wherein the rim has a volume sufficient to delimit to a maximum degree the insertion of the universal security implement in a container such that the terminal edge of the container is prevented from being urged past the rim.
 13. The universal security implement of claim 3, wherein the universal security implement possesses at least one manner of manipulation such that a requisite amount of force or leverage is used to disengage the universal security implement from a first container thereby allowing transfer to a second container, wherein the first container is different from the second container.
 14. The universal security implement of claim 3, wherein the rim possesses a volume sufficient to allow spatial manipulation of the universal security implement such that a requisite amount of force or leverage can be used to disengage the universal security implement from a first container and transferred to a second container, wherein the first container is different from the second container.
 15. The universal security implement of claim 1, wherein the immobilization implement contains at least one manner of immobilization which facilitates a press-fit restriction on the inner wall of a container such that the rotational, lateral, ascending, and descending movement of the universal security implement is prevented upon insertion into the container.
 16. The universal security implement of claim 1, wherein the at least one thread of the immobilization implement has a volume sufficient to facilitate a complete immobilization of the universal security implement upon insertion into a container.
 17. The universal security implement of claim 1, wherein the at least one thread of the immobilization implement has an extent sufficient to facilitate a complete immobilization of the universal security implement upon insertion into a container.
 18. The universal security implement of claim 1, wherein the at least one thread of the immobilization implement has a volume sufficient disallow disengagement with a container absent the requisite force or leverage needed to overcome the immobilization of the universal security implement within the container.
 19. The universal security implement of claim 1, wherein the at least one thread of the immobilization implement has an extent sufficient disallow disengagement with a container absent the requisite force or leverage needed to overcome the immobilization of the universal security implement within the container. 